NAPAC2022 - List of Authors (Aschenauer, E.C.)

Paper	Title	Page
WEPA15	High-Field Design Concept for Second Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider	648
	B.R. Gamage, R. Ent, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA D. Arbelaez, P. Ferracin, G.L. Sabbi LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, H. Witte BNL, Upton, New York, USA V.S. Morozov ORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA F. Savary CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland P.N. Vedrine CEA-DRF-IRFU, France A.V. Zlobin Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	Funding: Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Contract No. DE-SC0012704 and Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Efficient realization of the scientific potential of the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) calls for addition of a future second Interaction Region (2nd IR) and a detector in the RHIC IR8 region after the EIC project completion. The second IR and detector are needed to independently cross-check the results of the first detector, and to provide measurements with complementary acceptance. The available space in the existing RHIC IR8 and maximum fields achievable with NbTi superconducting magnet technology impose constraints on the 2nd IR performance. Since commissioning of the 2nd IR is envisioned in a few years after the first IR, such a long time frame allows for more R&D on the Nb₃Sn magnet technology. Thus, it could provide a potential alternative technology choice for the 2nd IR magnets. Presently, we are exploring its potential benefits for the 2nd IR performance, such as improvement of the luminosity and acceptance, and are also assessing the technical risks associated with use of Nb₃Sn magnets. In this paper, we present the current progress of this work.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-WEPA15
About •	Received ※ 04 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 17 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 31 August 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THZE2	Developing Control System Specifications and Requirements for Electron Ion Collider	901
	A. Blednykh, D.M. Gassner Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Electron-Ion Collider, Upton, New York, USA E.C. Aschenauer, P. Baxevanis, M. Blaskiewicz, K.A. Drees, T. Hayes, J.P. Jamilkowski, G.J. Marr, S. Nemesure, V. Schoefer, T.C. Shrey, K.S. Smith, F.J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York, USA L.R. Dalesio EPIC Consulting, Medford, New York, USA
	An Accelerator Research facility is a unique science and engineering challenge in that the requirements for developing a robust, optimized science facility are limited by engineering and cost limitations. Each facility is planned to achieve some science goal within a given schedule and budget and is then expected to operate for three decades. In three decades, the mechanical systems and the industrial IO to control them is not likely to change. In that same time, electronics will go through some 4 generations of change. The software that integrates the systems and provides tools for operations, automation, data analysis and machine studies will have many new standards. To help understand the process of designing and planning such a facility, we explain the specifications and requirements for the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) from both a physics and engineering perspective.
	Slides THZE2 [5.375 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-THZE2
About •	Received ※ 04 August 2022 — Revised ※ 10 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 11 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 13 September 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

High-Field Design Concept for Second Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider

648

B.R. Gamage, R. Ent, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
D. Arbelaez, P. Ferracin, G.L. Sabbi
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, H. Witte
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
V.S. Morozov
ORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
F. Savary
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
P.N. Vedrine
CEA-DRF-IRFU, France
A.V. Zlobin
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

Funding: Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Contract No. DE-SC0012704 and Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Efficient realization of the scientific potential of the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) calls for addition of a future second Interaction Region (2nd IR) and a detector in the RHIC IR8 region after the EIC project completion. The second IR and detector are needed to independently cross-check the results of the first detector, and to provide measurements with complementary acceptance. The available space in the existing RHIC IR8 and maximum fields achievable with NbTi superconducting magnet technology impose constraints on the 2nd IR performance. Since commissioning of the 2nd IR is envisioned in a few years after the first IR, such a long time frame allows for more R&D on the Nb₃Sn magnet technology. Thus, it could provide a potential alternative technology choice for the 2nd IR magnets. Presently, we are exploring its potential benefits for the 2nd IR performance, such as improvement of the luminosity and acceptance, and are also assessing the technical risks associated with use of Nb₃Sn magnets. In this paper, we present the current progress of this work.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-WEPA15

About •

Received ※ 04 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 17 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 31 August 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THZE2

Developing Control System Specifications and Requirements for Electron Ion Collider

901

A. Blednykh, D.M. Gassner
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Electron-Ion Collider, Upton, New York, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, P. Baxevanis, M. Blaskiewicz, K.A. Drees, T. Hayes, J.P. Jamilkowski, G.J. Marr, S. Nemesure, V. Schoefer, T.C. Shrey, K.S. Smith, F.J. Willeke
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
L.R. Dalesio
EPIC Consulting, Medford, New York, USA

An Accelerator Research facility is a unique science and engineering challenge in that the requirements for developing a robust, optimized science facility are limited by engineering and cost limitations. Each facility is planned to achieve some science goal within a given schedule and budget and is then expected to operate for three decades. In three decades, the mechanical systems and the industrial IO to control them is not likely to change. In that same time, electronics will go through some 4 generations of change. The software that integrates the systems and provides tools for operations, automation, data analysis and machine studies will have many new standards. To help understand the process of designing and planning such a facility, we explain the specifications and requirements for the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) from both a physics and engineering perspective.

Slides THZE2 [5.375 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-THZE2

About •

Received ※ 04 August 2022 — Revised ※ 10 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 11 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 13 September 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)