Author: Musson, J.
Paper Title Page
WEPA12 Operational Experience of the New Booster Cryomodule at the Upgraded Injector Test Facility 640
 
  • M.W. Bruker, R. Bachimanchi, J.M. Grames, M.D. McCaughan, J. Musson, P.D. Owen, T.E. Plawski, M. Poelker, T. Powers, H. Wang, Y.W. Wang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  
  Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177.
Since the early 1990s, the in­jec­tor of the CEBAF ac­cel­er­a­tor at Jef­fer­son Lab has re­lied on a nor­mal-con­duct­ing RF graded-beta cap­ture sec­tion to boost the ki­netic en­ergy of the elec­tron beam from 100 / 130 keV to 600 keV for sub­se­quent ac­cel­er­a­tion using a cry­omod­ule hous­ing two su­per­con­duct­ing 5-cell cav­i­ties sim­i­lar to those used through­out the ac­cel­er­a­tor. To sim­plify the in­jec­tor de­sign and im­prove the beam qual­ity, the nor­mal-con­duct­ing RF cap­ture sec­tion and the cry­omod­ule will be re­placed with a new sin­gle booster cry­omod­ule em­ploy­ing a su­per­con­duct­ing, β = 0.6, 2-cell-cav­ity cap­ture sec­tion and a sin­gle, β = 0.97, 7-cell cav­ity. The Up­graded In­jec­tor Test Fa­cil­ity at Jef­fer­son Lab is cur­rently host­ing the new cry­omod­ule to eval­u­ate its per­for­mance with beam be­fore in­stal­la­tion at CEBAF. While demon­strat­ing sat­is­fac­tory per­for­mance of the booster and good agree­ment with sim­u­la­tions, our beam test re­sults also speak to lim­i­ta­tions of ac­cel­er­a­tor op­er­a­tions in a noisy, ther­mally un­reg­u­lated en­vi­ron­ment. 		 
poster icon Poster WEPA12 [3.726 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-WEPA12  
About • Received ※ 03 August 2022 — Revised ※ 07 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 11 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 06 September 2022
Cite • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)