Paper | Title | Page |
---|---|---|
MOPA64 | Circular Modes for Mitigating Space-Charge Effects and Enabling Flat Beams | 189 |
|
||
Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 Flat beams are preferred in high-intensity accelerators and high-energy colliders due to one of the transverse plane emittances being smaller, which enhances luminosity and beam brightness. However, flat beams are devastating at low energies due to space charge forces which are significantly enhanced in one plane. The same is true, although to a lesser degree, for non-symmetric elliptical beams. In order to mitigate this effect, circular mode beam optics can be used. In this paper, we show that circular mode beams dilute space charge effects at lower energies, and can be transformed to flat beams later on. |
||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-MOPA64 | |
About • | Received ※ 09 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 12 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 23 August 2022 | |
Cite • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | |
MOPA90 | Relating Initial Distribution to Beam Loss on the Front End of a Heavy-Ion Linac Using Machine Learning | 263 |
|
||
Funding: This work was supported by a sub-reward from Argonne National Laboratory and supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. This work demonstrates using a Neural Network and a Gaussian Process to model the ATLAS front-end. Various neural network architectures were created and trained on the machine settings and outputs to model the phase space projections. The model was then trained on a dataset, with non-linear distortion, to gauge the transferability of the model from simulation to machine. |
||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-MOPA90 | |
About • | Received ※ 02 August 2022 — Revised ※ 05 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 06 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 11 September 2022 | |
Cite • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | |
TUPA30 | Development of a Compact 2D Carbon Beam Scanner for Cancer Therapy | 417 |
|
||
Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. This research was support through the DOE’s Accelerator Stewardship program. A novel trapezoidal coil 2D carbon beam scanner has been designed, and a prototype has been successfully developed and tested. The field performance of the magnet has been characterized and it is in excellent agreement with the simulations. A better than 1% field uniformity in both planes has been achieved within the useful aperture of the magnet. This represents a significant improvement over the prior art of the elephant-ear scanner design. A comparison of the two designs and the results from the new trapezoidal-coil design will be presented and discussed. Higher power and online beam testing are planned in the near future. |
||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-TUPA30 | |
About • | Received ※ 25 July 2022 — Revised ※ 14 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 15 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 25 August 2022 | |
Cite • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | |
TUPA34 | Model-Based Calibration of Control Parameters at the Argonne Wakefield Accelerator | 427 |
|
||
Particle accelerators utilize a large number of control parameters to generate and manipulate beams. Digital models and simulations are often used to find the best operating parameters to achieve a set of given beam parameters. Unfortunately, the optimized physics parameters cannot precisely be set in the control system due to, e.g., calibration uncertainties. We developed a data-driven physics-informed surrogate model using neural networks to replace digital models relying on beam-dynamics simulations. This surrogate model can then be used to perform quick diagnostics of the Argonne Wakefield accelerator in real time using nonlinear least-squares methods to find the most likely operating parameters given a measured beam distribution. | ||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-TUPA34 | |
About • | Received ※ 05 August 2022 — Revised ※ 09 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 10 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 24 September 2022 | |
Cite • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | |