NAPAC2022 - List of Keywords (luminosity)

Paper	Title	Other Keywords	Page
MOPA89	RHIC Electron Beam Cooling Analysis Using Principle Component and Autoencoder Analysis	electron, ECR, network, beam-cooling	260
	A.D. Tran, Y. Hao FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA X. Gu BNL, Upton, New York, USA
	Funding: Work supported by the US Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886. Principal component analysis and autoencoder analysis were used to analyze the experimental data of RHIC operation with low energy RHIC electron cooling (LEReC). This is unsupervised learning which includes electron beam settings and observable during operation. Both analyses were used to gauge the dimensional reducibility of the data and to understand which features are important to beam cooling.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-MOPA89
About •	Received ※ 02 August 2022 — Revised ※ 05 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 06 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 12 August 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUZD1	The Electron-Positron Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee)	collider, operation, electron, booster	315
	F. Zimmermann, M. Benedikt CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland K. Oide DPNC, Genève, Switzerland T.O. Raubenheimer SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by the European Union’s H2020 Framework Programme under grant agreement no.~951754 (FCCIS). The Future Circular electron-positron Collider (FCC-ee) is aimed at studying the Z and W bosons, the Higgs, and top quark with extremely high luminosity and good energy efficiency. Responding to a request from the 2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics, in 2021 the CERN Council has launched the FCC Feasibility Study to examine the detailed implementation of such a collider. This FCC Feasibility Study will be completed by the end of 2025 and its results be presented to the next Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics expected in 2026/27.
	Slides TUZD1 [10.072 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-TUZD1
About •	Received ※ 03 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 21 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 02 September 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUZD3	Ultimate Limits of Future Colliders	collider, acceleration, electron, factory	321
	M. Bai SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA V.D. Shiltsev Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA F. Zimmermann CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
	With seven operational colliders in the world and two under construction, the international particle physics community not only actively explores options for the next facilities for detailed studies of the Higgs/electroweak physics and beyond-the-LHC energy frontier, but seeks a clear picture of the limits of the colliding beams method. In this paper, we try to consolidate various recent efforts in identifying physics limits of colliders in conjunction with societal sustainability, and share our thoughts about the perspective of reaching the ultimate quantum limit.
	Slides TUZD3 [3.848 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-TUZD3
About •	Received ※ 25 July 2022 — Revised ※ 03 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 10 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 30 August 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPA15	High-Field Design Concept for Second Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider	electron, collider, proton, detector	648
	B.R. Gamage, R. Ent, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA D. Arbelaez, P. Ferracin, G.L. Sabbi LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, H. Witte BNL, Upton, New York, USA V.S. Morozov ORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA F. Savary CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland P.N. Vedrine CEA-DRF-IRFU, France A.V. Zlobin Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	Funding: Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Contract No. DE-SC0012704 and Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Efficient realization of the scientific potential of the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) calls for addition of a future second Interaction Region (2nd IR) and a detector in the RHIC IR8 region after the EIC project completion. The second IR and detector are needed to independently cross-check the results of the first detector, and to provide measurements with complementary acceptance. The available space in the existing RHIC IR8 and maximum fields achievable with NbTi superconducting magnet technology impose constraints on the 2nd IR performance. Since commissioning of the 2nd IR is envisioned in a few years after the first IR, such a long time frame allows for more R&D on the Nb₃Sn magnet technology. Thus, it could provide a potential alternative technology choice for the 2nd IR magnets. Presently, we are exploring its potential benefits for the 2nd IR performance, such as improvement of the luminosity and acceptance, and are also assessing the technical risks associated with use of Nb₃Sn magnets. In this paper, we present the current progress of this work.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-WEPA15
About •	Received ※ 04 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 17 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 31 August 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Other Keywords

Page

MOPA89

RHIC Electron Beam Cooling Analysis Using Principle Component and Autoencoder Analysis

electron, ECR, network, beam-cooling

260

A.D. Tran, Y. Hao
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
X. Gu
BNL, Upton, New York, USA

Funding: Work supported by the US Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886.
Principal component analysis and autoencoder analysis were used to analyze the experimental data of RHIC operation with low energy RHIC electron cooling (LEReC). This is unsupervised learning which includes electron beam settings and observable during operation. Both analyses were used to gauge the dimensional reducibility of the data and to understand which features are important to beam cooling.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-MOPA89

About •

Received ※ 02 August 2022 — Revised ※ 05 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 06 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 12 August 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUZD1

The Electron-Positron Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee)

collider, operation, electron, booster

315

F. Zimmermann, M. Benedikt
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
K. Oide
DPNC, Genève, Switzerland
T.O. Raubenheimer
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by the European Union’s H2020 Framework Programme under grant agreement no.~951754 (FCCIS).
The Future Circular electron-positron Collider (FCC-ee) is aimed at studying the Z and W bosons, the Higgs, and top quark with extremely high luminosity and good energy efficiency. Responding to a request from the 2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics, in 2021 the CERN Council has launched the FCC Feasibility Study to examine the detailed implementation of such a collider. This FCC Feasibility Study will be completed by the end of 2025 and its results be presented to the next Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics expected in 2026/27.

Slides TUZD1 [10.072 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-TUZD1

About •

Received ※ 03 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 21 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 02 September 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUZD3

Ultimate Limits of Future Colliders

collider, acceleration, electron, factory

321

M. Bai
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
V.D. Shiltsev
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
F. Zimmermann
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland

With seven operational colliders in the world and two under construction, the international particle physics community not only actively explores options for the next facilities for detailed studies of the Higgs/electroweak physics and beyond-the-LHC energy frontier, but seeks a clear picture of the limits of the colliding beams method. In this paper, we try to consolidate various recent efforts in identifying physics limits of colliders in conjunction with societal sustainability, and share our thoughts about the perspective of reaching the ultimate quantum limit.

Slides TUZD3 [3.848 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-TUZD3

About •

Received ※ 25 July 2022 — Revised ※ 03 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 10 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 30 August 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPA15

High-Field Design Concept for Second Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider

electron, collider, proton, detector

648

B.R. Gamage, R. Ent, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
D. Arbelaez, P. Ferracin, G.L. Sabbi
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, H. Witte
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
V.S. Morozov
ORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
F. Savary
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
P.N. Vedrine
CEA-DRF-IRFU, France
A.V. Zlobin
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

Funding: Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Contract No. DE-SC0012704 and Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Efficient realization of the scientific potential of the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) calls for addition of a future second Interaction Region (2nd IR) and a detector in the RHIC IR8 region after the EIC project completion. The second IR and detector are needed to independently cross-check the results of the first detector, and to provide measurements with complementary acceptance. The available space in the existing RHIC IR8 and maximum fields achievable with NbTi superconducting magnet technology impose constraints on the 2nd IR performance. Since commissioning of the 2nd IR is envisioned in a few years after the first IR, such a long time frame allows for more R&D on the Nb₃Sn magnet technology. Thus, it could provide a potential alternative technology choice for the 2nd IR magnets. Presently, we are exploring its potential benefits for the 2nd IR performance, such as improvement of the luminosity and acceptance, and are also assessing the technical risks associated with use of Nb₃Sn magnets. In this paper, we present the current progress of this work.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2022-WEPA15

About •

Received ※ 04 August 2022 — Revised ※ 11 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 17 August 2022 — Issue date ※ 31 August 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)